Preface
On 28 May 1999, Contracting States of the International Civil Aviation
Organization signed the new Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules
for International Carriage by Air, which emerged from the International
Conference on Air Law, held in Montreal from 10 to 28 May 1999. The new
Montreal Convention, once it receives the 30th instrument of ratification,
is intended to defragment the various scattered pieces of treaty which
govern the regime of private air carrier liability. It was also the last
major initiative of ICAO before the dawn of the year 2000. The Montreal
Convention symbolises the compelling need for the aviation community to
focus on new issues and to refurbish old ones in an appropriate garb for
the dawning millennium.
There are two types of mega trends affecting the aviation industry today.
They are country mergers and airline mergers. Both these trends affect
the airline industry profoundly. Of these, the unification of Europe is
the largest single influence on international airlines. On 1 January 1993,
12 European countries commenced sharing their air traffic rights and strengthening
their airlines' marketing potential. Ever since, there have been significant
developments within Europe sufficient to completely change the face of
the aviation industry in the region over a short span of 7 years.
In the new millennium, individual airlines would be compelled to remain
competitive, just to survive. They would need to flow with the tide of
such commercial trends as privatization, the use of information technology,
removing infrastructure constraints and governmental restraints and most
importantly, changing travel patterns. These trends have given rise to
the new phenomenon in the global aviation scene that survival (if not success),
of airlines is now dependent not on pricing but on service. This new phenomenon
calls for the airline product to be similar to one from the entertainment
industry, bearing in mind that a passenger spends 70% of his total travel
time in the aircraft on long distance flights. To counter strong alliances
between countries and airlines, the smaller carriers (as well as the big
ones) are now going in more for glamour and in flight luxury to score on
the 70% in flight time. Personal video screens for every seat, satellite
assisted telephone facilities and tele-conference services are some of
the luxuries offered. Indeed, as David Shoenfeld, International Marketing
Vice President of Federal Express said, "if you view your services as flying
between terminals, you miss the point".
The view that "marketing is determined from the view of the customer"
is becoming more valuable now more than ever before. To survive, airlines
have to build "brand recognition". In this context, the International Travel
Market Research (INTRAMAR) study is one of the best indicators of the key
strategic factors towards achieving passenger satisfaction. INTRAMAR usually
measures for each airline a PAX/SAT (passenger satisfaction) index that
correlates closely with the major indicators of airline performance. An
INTRAMAR study, conducted on 44 of the world's most profitable and financially
successful airlines reveals that Singapore Airlines received an extremely
high PAX/SAT index rating, coming second among all airlines of the world.
The first was Swissair.
According to the INTRAMAR survey, there are 12 important factors influencing
passenger choice. They are: flight punctuality; excellence of inflight
service; superiority of aircraft; comfortable seats; clean cabins seats
and washrooms; good food and beverages; superior first class; superior
business class; efficient reservations systems; pricing; good check in
service and attractive frequent flyer programmes. At least seven of these
factors are entirely dependent on the quality of the aircraft. The foremost
important factor - punctuality - cannot indeed, be achieved with aged aircraft.
The matter becomes more crucial to a relatively small airline, running
a small fleet of aircraft where, if one aircraft is grounded for reasons
of repair or maintenance, the entire flight schedule of the airline would
be in disarray, leading to delays down the line. Connecting services would
be disrupted and passengers stranded. It is needless to envisage the effect
this catastrophe would have on the airline's good name. No amount of superior
in flight service would atone for a six hour delay where a connecting passenger
has to sit inside an unknown airport terminal. It is therefore necessary
for any airline to seriously consider removing one of its most burdensome
infrastructural constraints - its ageing aircraft.
Another compelling reason for airlines to enter into commercial alliances,
modernize their fleets and enter into other new trends as franchising and
leasing is that ageing aircraft do not conform to noise restrictions imposed
by many countries and thus face being barred from certain airports. The
noise issue has become a crucial environment issue in the world aviation
community. At the 27th Session of the Assembly of the International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO) held in Montreal in 1989, when the matter
of possible noise restrictions on subsonic jet aircraft was taken up, the
main concern of the Assembly was to achieve a balance between the desire
to protect the environment around airports against unnecessary noise and
the desire to avoid excessive costs associated with accelerated replacement
of noisier aircraft, particularly where these aircraft were registered
in countries which did not themselves intend to introduce noise-related
operating instructions. In the Sessional discussions, The Airport Associations
Co-ordinating Council (AACC, now Airports Council International, ACI) noted
that aircraft noise represented a major constraint upon the future viability
and capacity of the aviation system. Unless concerted international action
was taken, there would be a proliferation of various local legislation
banning noisy aircraft from their airports - a measure that would have
a devastating effect on air commerce. The International Air Transport Association
(IATA) representing the airlines at the Session noted that the airline
industry recognized the need in many States to address political and other
concerns relating to the environment and the fact that the noise climate
in areas adjacent to airports is linked to the ability of airports to provide
expanded travel facilities to meet the growing demand of air travel. The
ICAO Assembly ultimately decided that further time was necessary for consultation
and analysis with a view to reaching consensus, and deferred the issue
to the 28th Session (Extraordinary) of the Assembly which was held in Montreal
in October 1990.
At its 28th Session (Extraordinary), the ICAO Assembly, by its Resolution
A28-3 resolved to urge States not to commence phasing out noisy aircraft
until 1 April 1995, and to spread out the phasing in period over 7 years
from 1 April 1995, so that airlines would have time to renew their aircraft
fleets or hush-kit (silence the engines of aircraft) them to conform to
prescribed noise levels. ICAO further urged States not to restrict before
the end of the phase in period the operations of any aircraft less than
25 years of age from the date the aircraft was issued its first certificate
of airworthiness and to assist aircraft operators in their efforts to accelerate
fleet modernization.
The standards of the international community on ageing aircraft are
now clear. States have been given the right by the international civil
aviation community to start phasing out aircraft from 1 April 1995, exactly
three years from now, until the year 2002. What this means is that airlines
that have in their fleets ageing aircraft would have to commence modernizing
their fleets soon. If they fail to modernize their fleet their ageing aircraft
would not be admitted to countries which have phased them out by legislation.
The need for modernizing ageing aircraft fleets has become more compelling
than ever, and is amply reflected by the recommendations made by the Fourth
Meeting of ICAO’s Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP)
which was held from 6 to 8 April 1998. CAEP has recommended the reduction
by an average of about 16 per cent levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) that
aircraft engines are currently allowed to emit under Annex 16 to the Chicago
Convention. CAEP has also recommended that States implement ICAO’s new
Communications, Navigation, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management systems
(CNS/ATM), thereby implicitly requiring aircraft to be equipped with the
modern facilities onboard to comply with the satellite navigation systems
introduced by the CNS/ATM systems.
Another measure taken by CAEP at its Fourth Meeting which would seriously
impact airlines with ageing fleets, needing them to consider the modernization
of their fleets, was CAEP’s commitment to carry out more work in the future
to establish new noise standards for jet aeroplanes that would be more
stringent than the present Chapter 3 Standards in Annex 16.
ICAO records that between 1989 and 1998 the reported number of commercial
aircraft in service increased by about 60 per cent from 11,253 to 18, 139
aircraft. In 1998, 1463 jet aircraft were ordered, compared with 1309 in
1997, and 929 were delivered compared with 674 aircraft in 1997. In 1998,
the total scheduled traffic carried by airlines of the 185 Contracting
States of ICAO amounted to a total of about 1462 million passengers and
about 26 million tonnes of freight. These figures are reflective of the
rapidly increasing frequency of aircraft movements at airports, calling
for drastic management of airport capacity. To cope with the demand, airlines
are forming strategic alliances with themselves by utilizing such commercial
tools as franchising, leasing and interchange of aircraft.
Competent airline managers now need to know that in the foreseeable
future, there would be a few mega-carriers operating in America, Europe,
Asia and the Pacific Rim and that these carriers would probably be composites
of strong strategic alliances between powerful airlines and powerful regional
States. They would be well equipped to offer the quality of service and
punctuality that modern glamour requires of air travel. To compete with
these carriers for a fair share of the market, a smaller airline would
have to offer a comparable product. This book addresses some new issues
that the aviation industry may find topical and applicable to modern aviation
management in the new millennium.